Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The manuscript is original, has not been previously published, and is not currently under consideration by another journal. Any prior dissemination, including preprints, conference abstracts, dissertations, or related publications, has been disclosed to the editors.
- The manuscript is complete and includes the author names, affiliations, corresponding-author information, acknowledgments, funding information, competing-interest declaration, and other required declarations. The manuscript has not been anonymized, and a separate title page is not required.
- The manuscript is submitted as a .doc or .docx file using Letter or A4 page size, approximately 1-inch or 2.5-cm margins, an 11- or 12-point professional font, 1.5 or double line spacing, left alignment, page numbers, and clearly defined and consistently numbered sections and subsections. Main sections should follow the sequence 1, 2, 3; subsections should follow 1.1, 1.2; and lower-level subsections should follow 1.1.1, 1.1.2, where applicable. Continuous line numbering is recommended.
- All figures and tables are included in the complete manuscript, numbered, cited in the text, and accompanied by clear titles, notes, or captions. Separate figure or table files have been uploaded only when needed to preserve image quality, resolution, editability, formatting, or production usability.
- All references cited in the manuscript appear in the reference list, and all entries in the reference list are cited in the manuscript. DOI links have been included where available.
- The research complies with applicable ethical standards. Approval or exemption from an appropriate ethics review body, and informed consent where applicable, are reported in the manuscript.
- All funding sources, institutional support, and competing interests have been fully disclosed in the submission metadata and manuscript.
- The authors have obtained permission to reproduce any copyrighted material, identifiable participant content, assessment instruments, images, or other third-party material included in the submission.
- Any data, code, research materials, instruments, or supplementary files necessary to evaluate the submission have been included within the manuscript, uploaded as Supplementary Material or Other, or clearly described in the data-availability statement, including any access restrictions.
- Any use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools in preparing the submission has been disclosed, where applicable.
- All listed authors meet JERN’s authorship criteria, have approved the submitted version, and agree to be accountable for the work. For manuscripts with more than one author, an author-contribution statement using CRediT roles, where applicable, has been included and approved by all authors.
Research Articles
Research Articles report original empirical work examining how experience shapes cognitive, behavioural, or neural systems. JERN welcomes experimental, longitudinal, developmental, observational, intervention, replication, and other rigorous research designs across the lifespan and across domains of experience.
Submissions should clearly identify the experience-related phenomenon under investigation, explain the theoretical or mechanistic question motivating the study, and show how the findings test, constrain, refine, challenge, or enable mechanistic accounts of experience-related change. Mechanistic claims must remain proportionate to the study design and evidence.
Research Articles should report methods and analyses with sufficient transparency to support rigorous evaluation and, where possible, replication. Authors should distinguish confirmatory, exploratory, and post hoc analyses; report null and unexpected findings; and provide appropriate information about ethics, funding, competing interests, data, materials, code, and preregistration where applicable.
Research Articles are typically around 8,000–10,000 words, excluding the abstract, references, tables, figures, appendices, and supplementary materials. This is flexible guidance rather than a strict limit. Shorter or longer manuscripts may be considered when justified by the study design, methodological complexity, interdisciplinary scope, or scholarly contribution.
Review Articles
Review Articles synthesize and critically evaluate research relevant to experience-related neuroplasticity. This category includes systematic reviews, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and focused integrative reviews.
Submissions should extend beyond summarizing the literature by identifying explanatory mechanisms, evaluating competing accounts, clarifying boundary conditions, integrating evidence across disciplines or levels of analysis, and developing productive directions for future research.
Authors should clearly define the review question and scope, explain how evidence was identified and selected, and describe the methods used to evaluate and synthesize the literature. Systematic reviews, scoping reviews, and meta-analyses should follow appropriate reporting standards and provide sufficient methodological detail to support transparency and reproducibility.
Review Articles are typically around 8,000–10,000 words, excluding the abstract, references, tables, figures, appendices, and supplementary materials. This is flexible guidance rather than a strict limit. Shorter or longer manuscripts may be considered when justified by the breadth, methodological approach, interdisciplinary scope, or scholarly contribution of the review.
Theory Articles
Theory Articles introduce a new theoretical framework or substantially develop, revise, integrate, or challenge an existing account of experience-related change. New empirical data are not required, but the article must make a clear and original explanatory contribution.
Submissions should identify the central explanatory problem, define key concepts and assumptions, and specify the proposed mechanism or mechanisms with sufficient precision. Authors should explain the level or levels of analysis addressed, the explanatory scope of the account, and the conditions under which it is expected—or not expected—to apply.
Theory Articles should engage critically and fairly with relevant evidence and competing explanations. Authors must distinguish established findings from theoretical interpretation, acknowledge evidence that is inconsistent with the proposed account, and explain how the new framework differs from, integrates, or improves upon existing theories.
Strong submissions should generate clear, testable predictions and identify observations or findings that would support, constrain, challenge, or require revision of the proposed account. Mechanistic claims must remain proportionate to the available evidence and should not be presented as established causal processes when they remain theoretical proposals.
Authors are encouraged to include a conceptual figure, model, or table that summarizes the proposed mechanisms, relationships among constructs, temporal sequence, boundary conditions, or principal predictions. Formal or computational models are welcome but are not required.
Theory Articles are typically around 5,000–9,000 words, excluding the abstract, references, tables, figures, appendices, and supplementary materials. This is flexible guidance rather than a strict limit. Shorter or longer manuscripts may be considered when justified by the conceptual scope, interdisciplinary integration, formal complexity, or scholarly contribution.
Methods and Resources Articles
Methods and Resources Articles present new or substantially improved methods, measures, experimental paradigms, analytic approaches, datasets, software, protocols, or other research resources relevant to experience-related neuroplasticity.
Submissions should identify the scientific or methodological problem addressed and explain how the contribution improves the measurement, analysis, interpretation, reproducibility, or mechanistic investigation of experience-related change. The relevance to JERN’s scope must be explicit; the presentation of a method, dataset, or tool alone is not sufficient.
Authors should describe the development and implementation of the method or resource in enough detail to support evaluation, replication, and reuse. Appropriate validation, benchmarking, reliability assessment, or comparison with existing alternatives should be provided. Claims regarding accuracy, performance, validity, or utility must remain proportionate to the evidence presented.
Manuscripts should clearly define the intended applications, users, assumptions, requirements, and limitations of the contribution. Where relevant, authors should include an illustrative application or use case showing how the method or resource can support research on experience-related neuroplasticity.
Software, datasets, protocols, instruments, and other reusable resources should be deposited in an appropriate stable repository whenever ethically and legally possible. Authors should provide persistent links, version information, documentation, licensing or reuse terms, metadata, access instructions, and any code or materials necessary to reproduce the validation or demonstration. Restrictions on access must be clearly explained.
Dataset-focused submissions should describe how the data were generated or collected, what the deposited records contain, how data quality was assessed, and how the resource may appropriately be reused. Methods and Resources Articles should not merely announce a resource; they must provide adequate documentation, validation, and evidence of practical scholarly value.
Methods and Resources Articles are typically around 4,000–8,000 words, excluding the abstract, references, tables, figures, appendices, documentation, and supplementary materials. This is flexible guidance rather than a strict limit. Shorter or longer manuscripts may be considered when justified by the technical complexity, validation requirements, scale of the resource, or scholarly contribution.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright in their submitted and published work.
By submitting to the Journal of Experience-Related Neuroplasticity (JERN), authors grant ERN Press the right of first publication and permission to publish, distribute, archive, and identify the work as originally published in JERN.
Accepted articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This license permits others to share and adapt the work for any purpose, provided that appropriate credit is given, a link to the license is provided, and any changes are indicated.
Authors confirm that they have the authority to grant these rights and that the submission does not infringe the copyright or other rights of any third party.
Privacy Statement
The names, email addresses, affiliations, and other personal information entered on this journal site will be used only for the stated purposes of the Journal of Experience-Related Neuroplasticity, including account administration, manuscript submission, peer review, editorial communication, publication, and journal notifications. Personal information will be shared only as necessary to operate the journal, meet legal or ethical obligations, or with the user’s consent. It will not be sold or used for unrelated commercial purposes.